Here is an arrangement I see in some form every filing season. The husband is in the 30% slab. His wife has no income. So he moves ₹20 lakh into an FD in her name, reasoning that ₹1.4 lakh of interest will fall inside her basic exemption and cost the family nothing.
The gift is fine. The plan isn't. Every rupee of that interest belongs in his return, and the bank's TDS is sitting on her PAN.
This is the clubbing rule. It has been in the law for decades, and it moved into the Income-tax Act, 2025 almost unchanged.
# Where the rules live now
From 1 April 2026, the clubbing provisions sit in Chapter V of the Income-tax Act, 2025 ("Income of other persons included in total income of assessee"). The section numbers below are verified against the Act text published by the Income Tax Department. For the wider renumbering, see our old vs new section cheat sheet.
| What it covers | Income-tax Act, 2025 | Income-tax Act, 1961 |
|---|---|---|
| Transfer of income without transferring the asset | Section 96 | Section 60 |
| Spouse's salary from a concern where you have substantial interest | Section 99(1)(a)(i) | Section 64(1)(ii) |
| Income from assets transferred to spouse without adequate consideration | Section 99(1)(a)(ii) | Section 64(1)(iv) |
| Income from assets transferred to son's wife | Section 99(1)(b) | Section 64(1)(vi) |
| Income of a minor child | Section 99(1)(c) | Section 64(1A) |
| Transfers to a person or AOP for the benefit of spouse or son's wife | Section 99(1)(d) | Section 64(1)(vii), (viii) |
| Gifted money invested in a business — proportionate clubbing | Section 99(2) | Explanation 3 to Section 64 |
| Member converting own property into HUF property | Section 99(3) | Section 64(2) |
The first thing to notice is the list. Clubbing covers your spouse, your son's wife, your minor child and your HUF. It does not cover adult children, parents, siblings or your daughter's husband. That boundary is where most legitimate planning lives, and we come back to it at the end.
# 1. Assets given to your spouse
Under Section 99(1)(a)(ii), income arising to your spouse from assets you transferred "otherwise than for adequate consideration" is included in your income. The only statutory carve-out is a transfer in connection with an agreement to live apart.
It does not matter what form the asset takes afterwards. If you gift cash and your spouse buys debentures with it, the debenture interest is still clubbed. The Income Tax Department's own taxpayer FAQ says as much.
# Second-generation income is the quiet exception
Clubbing reaches income from the transferred asset. It does not reach income earned by reinvesting that income. Over ten or fifteen years this matters, because the spouse's own pool grows while the original gift's income keeps getting clubbed.
It only works if the money trail is clean. Keep the gifted corpus and the reinvested interest in separate accounts. Once they are mixed, you will struggle to show which rupee earned what.
# House property follows its own rule
If the transferred asset is a house, the income is not clubbed under this clause at all. Section 99(1)(a)(ii) is expressly subject to the house property deeming rule (old Section 27), under which you are treated as the owner of the house you gifted to your spouse. The effect is the same — the rent is yours — but it arrives through a different door, and it also affects things like home-loan interest claims.
# When the gifted money goes into a business
If your spouse invests your gift in a business or brings it in as partner's capital, only a proportion of the business income is clubbed. Section 99(2) uses the ratio of the gifted investment to the total investment, both measured on the first day of the year.
# 2. Paying your spouse a salary from your own business
Section 99(1)(a)(i) catches salary, commission or fees paid to your spouse by a concern in which you have a substantial interest — broadly, 20% or more of the voting power in a company, or 20% or more of the profits of any other concern.
There is one real exception: remuneration that is solely attributable to the spouse's technical or professional qualification, knowledge and experience is not clubbed.
So a qualified CA wife doing the accounts of her husband's firm, at a market salary, is outside the rule. A spouse on the payroll at ₹6 lakh a year with no role that needs any qualification is inside it — and at a 30% slab, that ₹6 lakh can cost up to ₹1,87,200 in tax in your hands, compared with little or nothing if it had been hers under the new regime.
# 3. Your son's wife
Section 99(1)(b) applies the same rule to assets you transfer to your son's wife without adequate consideration. Income from those assets is clubbed in the hands of the father-in-law or mother-in-law who transferred them.
Families often use a daughter-in-law's lower slab for exactly this reason, and it doesn't work. Note the asymmetry: the law names the son's wife but not the daughter's husband, so a gift to a son-in-law is outside clubbing.
Section 99(1)(d) closes the obvious workaround — routing the asset through another person or an association of persons for the benefit of your spouse or son's wife.
# 4. Your minor child
This is the rule most parents get wrong, because they think it is about their gifts. It is not.
Under Section 99(1)(c), all income arising to a minor child is clubbed with a parent, whoever gave the money — you, the grandparents, an uncle. The exceptions are income from:
- work done by the child;
- activities using the child's own skill, talent, specialised knowledge or experience;
- a child with a disability of the nature specified in Section 154 (old 80U).
Under Section 99(5), the income goes to the parent whose total income before clubbing is higher, while the marriage subsists. If the parents are no longer married, it goes to the parent who maintains the child.
# The ₹1,500 exemption — and why it's worth almost nothing now
Under the 1961 Act, Section 10(32) exempted up to ₹1,500 per child per year of clubbed income. That exemption was specifically switched off under the new regime by Section 115BAC(2). Treat it as an old-regime relief under the 2025 Act too, and confirm the Tax Year 2026-27 position before relying on it. If you are unsure which regime you are in, our old vs new regime decision guide settles it.
This is also why a child's PAN often shows TDS and AIS entries that belong in a parent's return. Pick them up there.
# 5. Putting your own money into your HUF
A gift from a member to an HUF is not taxed as income of the HUF — for an HUF, "relative" under Section 92 means any member. That is the half people remember.
The half they forget is Section 99(3) (old 64(2)). If you, as a member, convert your own property into HUF property — by impressing it with family character, throwing it into the common stock, or transferring it to the family without adequate consideration — the income from that property is deemed to be yours.
Section 99(3) goes one step further. If that property is later partitioned, the income from the share that goes to your spouse is treated as arising from an asset transferred indirectly to her — and clubbed in your hands again.
An HUF earns its keep when its corpus comes from elsewhere: ancestral property, a share on partition of a larger HUF, or assets received under a will. Our HUF tax planning guide covers formation and where the benefit genuinely lies.
# Workarounds that don't work
# Cross transfers
You gift ₹10 lakh to your brother's wife; your brother gifts ₹10 lakh to yours. Neither is a transfer to your own spouse, on paper. The Supreme Court in CIT v. Keshavji Morarji looked through such interconnected, circuitous transfers and applied clubbing as though each person had gifted to their own spouse. Tax officers know this pattern well.
# Giving away the income but keeping the asset
Assigning the rent, interest or dividend from an asset to your spouse while you keep the asset gets you nowhere. Section 96 (old Section 60) taxes that income in the transferor's hands, whether the arrangement is revocable or not. The provisions that follow it (old Sections 61 to 63) do the same for revocable transfers of the asset itself.
# Calling it a loan
Section 99 bites on transfers "otherwise than for adequate consideration". A genuine loan is not a gift, and a loan to a spouse at a commercial rate of interest, documented, with the interest actually paid and taxed in your hands, is on firm ground. An interest-free "loan" that is never repaid is where it gets contested. Whether it counts as an indirect transfer turns on the facts, and I would not rely on it without specific advice.
# What actually still works
- Gifts to adult children and parents. They are relatives, so the gift is exempt in their hands, and Section 99 does not reach them. The income is theirs. The money must genuinely pass to their control.
- Second-generation income of your spouse, kept in a separate, traceable account.
- Your spouse's own income and savings, invested in her own name, with her own money trail.
- Paying a qualified spouse a market salary for real work that uses that qualification.
- An HUF funded by inheritance, a will or partition of a larger HUF — not by you.
I am often asked why anyone should bother tracking whose money is whose, since it is all family money anyway. The answer is that the Income-tax Act does not have a concept of family money. It has your money, your spouse's money, and a set of rules about which is which.
See your family's money the way the tax department does. VittSphere ONE's Family Portfolio View shows every member's and the HUF's holdings side by side, so you can see what is really whose before a transfer creates a clubbing problem. Start free →
# References (verified 23 September 2026)
- Income Tax Department — Section 99, Income-tax Act, 2025 (income of spouse, minor child, etc.)
- Income Tax Department — Section 96, Income-tax Act, 2025 (transfer of income without transfer of assets)
- Income Tax Department — Section 92, Income-tax Act, 2025 (income from other sources; gifts and definition of relative)
- Income Tax Department — Can income from assets transferred to spouse without adequate consideration be clubbed?
- Income Tax Department — Section 115BAC, Income-tax Act, 1961 (exemptions not allowed under new regime)
- Income Tax Department — Section 64, Income-tax Act, 1961
- Teachoo — Cross transfer to avoid clubbing (CIT v. Keshavji Morarji)
Disclaimer: This article is educational and general in nature and is not tax advice for your specific situation. All worked examples use illustrative figures and an assumed 7% interest rate, not any client's data; the opening scenario is a typical pattern, not a specific client. Clubbing turns heavily on facts — the nature of the transfer, the consideration, the money trail and the family relationship — so confirm your position with a qualified Chartered Accountant before making or restructuring any transfer. Data verified 23 September 2026.
Turn this article into your own tax plan.
